|
Bakersfield College Microbiology B16 |
|||||
|
Criteria and Point Value for Team Case 1: Scientific Method |
|||||
|
Expected Outcome |
Unsatisfactory - |
Developing -
demonstrates partial completion of expectations |
Accomplished
- |
Mastery
- |
Points |
|
REPORT STRUCTURE |
The report is incomplete and/or there are grammar errors. |
The report is complete, neat, & well-written. There are a few grammatical errors. |
The report is complete, neat, & organized, formatted according to the instructions for papers in Microbiology. |
The report is complete, neat, organized, without errors, and formatted according to the instructions for papers in Microbiology. |
|
|
SCIENTIFIC METHOD
|
Analysis of data is not evident. Thinking is fuzzy & hard to follow. |
The data analysis is included but inadequate. |
The team carefully recorded their thinking and analysis which show apparent integration of anatomy, physiology and microbiology. |
The report is thorough and displays critical analysis of the material (as compared to simply rewriting the information found on the web). |
|
|
REPORT CONTENT |
The report has missing information or inadequate answers to the questions |
Questions were answered and reported but the sources are not reliable or not cited. There is obvious effort for teamwork and communication. |
The report fully answered all the questions. The final report is a team effort & integrates data identified and analyzed. Synthesis as a result of teamwork is evident. |
All questions are answered using excellent, cited sources. The final report is a team effort & integrates all three roles. |
|
|
RESEARCH |
Background information is absent, no citations or research. |
Background information is limited to the book and displays minimal research. Some sources may be less reliable e.g. Wikipedia. |
Clear background information from relevant sources is used and cited. All courses are reliable. |
Relevant sources from the class and text, as well as exceptional outside sources are integrated into the report. MLA format is used for citations. |
|
|
TEAMWORK
& PRESENTATION |
The situation is simply restated and problem solving is limited. The problem is not clearly identified. |
The situation is explained, the main problem is identified and standard solutions are applied. There is some evidence of teamwork. |
The situation is analyzed, the problem is described with regards to many arenas, and potential solutions are discussed. Good teamwork is evident. |
The situation is evaluated; the problem is correctly identified and analyzed. Creative problem solving strategies are used to solve the problem in many arenas. Excellent teamwork is evident. |
|
|
Total Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments |
|
||||