|
Case Study Rubric - Criteria and Point Value for Team Case 2 |
|||||
|
Expected Outcome |
Unsatisfactory - |
Developing -
demonstrates partial completion of expectations |
Accomplished
- |
Mastery
- |
Points |
|
REPORT STRUCTURE |
Poor Organization Many grammar, spelling and/or formatting errors. |
Fairly well organized. There are a few grammatical, spelling and/or formatting errors. |
Well organized, & easy to follow. Rare grammatical, spelling or formatting error. |
The report is well organized, & easy to follow. There are absolutely no grammatical, spelling or formatting errors. |
|
|
CASE STUDY |
The report is missing crucial information and, as a rule, questions are inadequately answered. |
All questions are answered but either appropriate information is not used and/or supporting data is largely absent. |
The report fully answered all the questions using reliable sources but there is little supporting data. |
The report is thorough and displays critical analysis of the material (as compared to simply rewriting the information found on the web). All questions are answered using excellent, cited sources. |
|
|
RESEARCH |
Background information is limited. |
Outside information and resources are used but the quality of the resources is low. |
Quality, relevant sources and significant information from the text and outside resources are present and properly cited. |
Relevant sources from the class and text, as well as exceptional outside sources are integrated into the report and correctly cited. |
|
|
REPORT CONTENT AND CRITICAL THINKING |
Thinking is fuzzy & hard to follow. Inadequate information and data leads to inaccurate conclusions in the case. |
The final report displays information and data relevant to the case. Reasoning for conclusions is hard to follow, but somewhat present. |
The report integrates data and shows analysis of resources to determine conclusions or answers to case study questions. Reasoning is clearly evident. |
The final report integrates class information and outside resources resulting in an organized logical, easy to follow. |
|
|
TEAMWORK & PRESENTATION |
The case information is simply restated. There is no organization or polish to the oral presentation. Evidence of teamwork is lacking. |
The case is fully described; the main conclusions are well communicated. There is some evidence of teamwork. Class questions are answered poorly or not at all. |
The presentation shows clear organization, teamwork, careful analysis, with regards to many arenas and potential solutions. Presentation is practiced and interesting. Class questions are answered. |
Excellent, well-organized, interesting, practiced presentation. Excellent teamwork is evident. The presentation stimulates class questions and the team responds to them well. |
|
|
Comments
|
Total Points |
|
|||
Bakersfield College | Kern Community College District |
Janet Fulks
1801 Panorama Dr. - Bakersfield, CA 93305 - (661)395-4011
Date last updated
09/25/2010