POWER POINT CH 2
ADMJ 4
POWER POINT PRESENTATIONS
FALL 2002
POWER
POINT CH 1
POWER
POINT CH 2
POWER POINT CH 7
POWER POINT CH 8
POWER POINT FOSTER CASE
Factual Innocence Cases
GREYT Link contributed by Bert
Gutierrez--ADMJ 4.
Innocence
Project Cases
POWER POINT
CHAPTER 3
REVIEW THIS SLIDE SHOW CAREFULLY FOR CASE BRIEF TERMINOLOGY AS WELL.
POWER POINT CHAPTER 4
LEVELS
OF KNOWLEDGE CHART
POWER
POINT CHAPTER 12
POWER
POINT CHAPTER12 SENTENCING
WE'RE
AT THE FINISH LINE! SEE YOU AT THE FINAL EXAM!
www.crimelibrary.com
GREYT LINK contributed by SANDY
HUERTA ADMJ 4
CASE BRIEF ASSIGNMENT:
DUE AS PUBLISHED IN MEMO CIRCULATED IN CLASS.
LEGAL RESEARCH CASES: SEE MEMO FOR COMPLETE
INSTRUCTIONS AND DUE DATES.
DIRECTIONS:
EACH STUDENT SHALL LOCATE THE ASSIGNED CASE THROUGH THE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY
SEARCH PROCESS. PRINT THE SYLLABUS ONLY. THE SYLLABUS INCLUDES ALL MATERIALS
COMMENCING WITH THE TITLE AND CITATION OF THE CASE TO THE PORTION OF THE CASE
READING: " Justice…delivered the opinion of the Court."
You must read the entire opinion in order to prepare
the case brief.
The citations for cases are found in the textbook under "Table of
Cases."
Fourth Amendment cases
1. Weeks v. U.S (1914)
2. Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
3. Warden v. Hayden (1967)
4. Smith v. Ohio (1990)
5. Wong Sun v. U.S.(1963)
6. U.S. v. Leon (1984)
7. Massachusetts v. Maxwell (1984)
8. Segura v. U.S.(1984)
9. Nix v. Williams (1984)
10. Coolidge v. New Hampshire (1971)
11. U.S. v. Ceccolini (1984)
12. New York v. Harris (1990)
13. Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents (1971)
14. PA Board of Probation/Parole v. Scott (1998)
15. U.S. v. Havens (1980)
16. Illinois v. Krull (1987)
17. Arizona v. Evans (1995)
18. Jones v. United States (1960)
19. Rawlings v. Kentucky (1980)
20. Minnesota v. Cater (1998)
21. Minnesota v. Olson (1990)
22. Illinois v. Gates (1984)
23. Arizona v. Hicks (1987)
24. Katz v. U.S. (1968)
25. Texas v. Brown (1983)
26. Bumper v. North Carolina (1968)
27. Schneckloth v. Bustmonte (1973)
28. U.S. v. Mendenhall (1980)
29. Ohio v. Robinette (1996)
30. Florida v. Jimeno (1991)
31. Alabama v. White (1990)
32. Tennessee v. Garner (1984)
33. Terry v. Ohio (1968)
34. Brower v. Inyo County (1989)
35. California v. Hodari D. (1991)
36. County of Sacrmento v. Lewis (1998)
37. Peters v. New York (1968)
38. County of Riverside v. McLaughlin (1991)
39. Graham v. Connor (1989)
40. U.S. v. Watson (1976)
41. Payton v. New York (1980)
42. Welsh v. Wisconsin (1984)
43. Chimel v. California (1969)
44. New York v. Belton (1981)
45. Maryland v. Buie (1990)
46. Michigan v. Long (1983)
47. Adams v. Williams (1972)
48. Florida v. JL (2000)
49. City of Chicago v. Morales (1999)
50. Delaware v. Prouse (1979)
51. Pennsylvania v. Mimms (1977)
52. Whren v. U.S. (1996)
53. Maryland v. Wilson (1997)
54. Florida v. Bostick (1991)
55. Michigan Department of Sate Police v. Sitz (1990)
56. City of Indianapolis v. Edmond (2000)
57. U.S. v. Sokolow (1998)
58. Mincey v. Arizona (1978)
59. Flippo v. West Virginia (1999)
60. California v. Acevedo (1991)
61. Florida v. Wells (1990)
62. California v. Carney (1985)
63. Florida v. White (1999)
64. U.S. v. Chadwick (1977)
65. Wyoming v. Hiughton (1999)
66. South Dakota v. Opperman (1976)
E-ME!! pdestefa@bc.cc.ca.us
REVIEW THE MOTION TABLE PROVIDED BELOW. BE CERTAIN TO PRINT IT FOR YOUR HARD COPY RECORDS.
|
Change of venue |
Personnel (judge) or location( trial) |
|
Demurrer |
Attacks sufficiency of pleadings |
|
Consolidate charges |
Kellet; P.C. 654 and 954 |
|
Severance of counts (burden on D) |
D/P cases; undue prejudice |
|
Severance of Defendants |
6th A concerns for confrontation where co-defendants implicate each other |
|
Continuance |
Delay in trial date |
|
Due process dismissal |
Time frame between commission of the crime and filing of charges (S/O/L) |
|
Speedy trial dismissal |
6th A addresses timing between charging and trial |
|
Speedy trial dismissal (statutory) |
P.C. 1382 controls with detail on nature of crime and custody status of defendant |
|
Discovery |
Brady material—exculpatory evidence; Note 3 major exceptions |
|
Informant disclosure |
Co-conspirator? Percipient witness? Entrapment defense? |
|
Pitchess motionrelevant in cases involving self-defense claims, resisting charges |
Peace officer personnel records; balancing test between due process and statutory privilege |
|
Trombetta/Youngblood |
No absolute duty to preserve evidence; D must show bad faith +exculpatory +cannot duplicate evidence |
|
Mejia |
P must deliberately make exculpatory W unavailable (deportation case) |
|
Wade/Gilbert |
D may move for line-up promptly after arrest or arraignment where bad ID is at issue; right to attorney presence |
|
Compel exemplars |
Blood, voice, writing, fingerprints, DNA, photographs |
|
Marsden |
6th A ineffective assistance |
|
Boykin/Tahl |
Challenges to priors (esp. pleas) in 3 strikes cases |
|
1538.5 |
Suppression of 4th A material |
|
Separate hearings |
ID procedures, Miranda compliance, due process |
|
Harvey-Whitley |
Challenges authenticity of information used by police to detain or arrest D (documents sources of info) |
|
Traverse a search warrant |
Theodor; challenges basis of warrant; sufficiency of information |
|
402 (in limine) |
Miranda compliance |
|
Kelly-Frye (in limine) |
Challenges validity of scientific evidence: "general acceptance test" |
|
995 |
Challenges sufficiency of GJ or preliminary hearing on procedural or substantive grounds |
|
352 (in limine) |
Challenges cumulative evidence e.g. gruesome photographs |