Math B6C – Chapter
12 Quiz – SOLUTIONS
* Fall 2001 *
___________________________________________________________________
1. Find
for the function g(x,
y) = ln(x2 + y2). Then
gx(1, 1) = ?

Thus, ![]()
___________________________________________________________________
2. For the function g of problem #1, compute
. Then gyx(1, 2) = ?
Since
this function is infinitely differentiable in the vicinity of (1,2), it follows that its mixed partial derivatives are
equal. Thus gyx
= gxy, and so we only need to
differentiate gx (which we found in
problem #1) with respect to y:

Thus, .

___________________________________________________________________
3. Find the linearization of f (x, y, z)
= xz2 – y2cos(z) at (1, 1, 0). L(x,y,z) = ?

___________________________________________________________________
4. For the function h(x, y)
= e2x+y, find the best quadratic approximation at
the point (0, 0).
Q(x,y)
= ?

______________________________________________________________________
5. f (x,
y, z) = x y 2
– y z + x 2 z .
Find the gradient of f at
(1,1,1).
The y-component of this gradient is _____ .
, and so

______________________________________________________________________
6. Find the directional derivative of the f in problem #5,
in the direction of
at the point (1,1,1). ![]()

_____________________________________________________________________
7. Find the equation of the tangent plane to x2
– y2 + z2
= 4 at the point (1,1,2).
Let
. We seek the tangent
plane to the level surface defined by
. One way to do
this is to find the linearization of F at the point (1, 1, 2), which as
usual we’ll call L. The tangent
plane is then just L(x,y,z)
= 4.

Thus our tangent plane is
given by
, or
![]()
_____________________________________________________________________
8. Find the linearization of f (x, y, z) = x
y z + 1 at (1, 2, 3). L(x, y, z) =

_____________________________________________________________________
9. Find the maximum value of f (x, y, z) = x
+ y z on the sphere
x 2 + y 2 + z 2 =
3.
We
use the method of Lagrange Multipliers for this problem. Let
.
Then extrema of f are to be found at points where, for some l,
. Then
and
,
yielding the following equations:

The
first of these equations gives us
. Substitution the
second equation into the third yields
, from which we deduce
that
, and so the only two possible solutions for l are
, and hence
. So now we know
that:
![]()
Now we substitute what we know into the equation
, since any solution must be on that sphere:

Now we know that:
![]()
And we must check to see which of these 8 points (since these “plus or minuses” are all independent) is the maximum:

So
the maximum value of f on the given sphere is 2 (and the minimum value is –2).
_____________________________________________________________________
10. If a triolic field
intensity is described by
T(x, y, z) = sin(xyz), then the triolic
field is increasing at (1, 2, p/2) most rapidly in the
direction of . . .
A
scalar field like T increases most rapidly in the direction of its gradient:

_____________________________________________________________________
11. How fast is the triolic
field increasing in the direction you found in #10?
(approximately)
The
length of the gradient vector we just found in #10 is precisely what we seek:

which
approximately equals
.
_____________________________________________________________________
12. Find the tangent plane to the surface defined
by
at (1,0,0).
The
equation is given by z = L(x,y), where L is the linearization of G
at (1,0).

_____________________________________________________________________
13. Let T(x, y, z)
= x2yz describe
the temperature at (x, y, z). How hot is the hottest spot on the surface
implicitly defined by
?
We
use the method of Lagrange Multipliers for this problem. Let
. Extrema of f
are to be found at points where, for some l,
. Then
and
,
yield the following equations:

There are many ways to proceed. One way is to take ratios of the first two equations and the second two:
which
yields ![]()
which
yields ![]()
Now substitute (expressing everything in terms of y) into the constraint equation:

Then
we have
and
. All of these
“plusses or minuses” are independent, so we must check T out on all
these 8 points:

Thus the hottest point on the surface has a temperature of
.
_____________________________________________________________________
14. Find the maximum of x + y + z subject to the constraint
?
Suppose
that x=0
and y=1. The constraint equation
is then satisfied regardless of what z equals. Thus z can be made as large as we
like, and so can the sum x + y + z. This means there is no maximum of x + y + z subject to the given
constraint.
Given
any (large) real number R, there are points on the surface
, the sum of whose coordinates surpass R.
_____________________________________________________________________
15. Find the equation of the tangent plane to the
surface
at (1,1,1).
Let
. We seek the tangent
plane to the level surface defined by
. One way to
accomplish this is to find the linearization of F (which as usual we’ll
call L) at (1,1,1). The tangent plane will then be L(x,y,z) = 4.

Thus our tangent plane is
given by
, or
![]()
_____________________________________________________________________
16. Find any local extrema and saddle points
of
.
Extrema
and saddle points occur at any points where
.
![]()
This yields the following linear system:

Which has solution x = 0,
y = –1. Thus a possible extremum
or saddle point is (0, –1).
To see which it is, we invoke the multivariable second derivative test. We need the second derivative matrix, the
Hessian:

The determinant of this matrix is –40 – 16 = –56 < 0, hence our point (0, –1) is a saddle point.
_____________________________________________________________________
17. Find any local extrema and
saddle points of
over the open
rectangle defined by 0 < x < 3, 0 < y < 3. Give the value of the function
at this
point, and classify it as a saddle
point, local maximum or local minimum:
Extrema
and saddle points occur at any points where
.
![]()
This yields the following nonlinear system:

The first equation has solutions x =1 with y=anything, or y=0
with x=anything. The second
equation has solutions
x=0 with y=anything,
or x=2 with y=anything, or
with x=anything. The
conjunction of the first set of solutions with the second yields the following
possible local extrema or saddle points:
![]()
To see whether these points are maxima, minima, or saddle points, we invoke the multivariable second derivative test. The second derivative matrix, the Hessian, is
.
The determinant of this matrix is
.
Evaluating this Hessian determinant function at each of our candidate points, we get:
![]()
Thus the first point is a possible max or min, while the second two points are saddle points. To see whether the first point is a max or a min, we evaluate gxx at this point:
![]()
Since
this second derivative is positive, the point
is a relative minimum of g.
_____________________________________________________________________
18. Find the absolute maximum of
over the rectangle
defined
by
. The highest
elevation on the graph of z = g(x,y)
above
this closed rectangle in the xy-plane is
_____ .
In problem #17, we learned that there are no local maximum points within the given rectangle. Thus we only need to check the edges and corners for any maximum or minimum points. The four edges can be parametrized as follows:

Taking
the composition of g over each of these paths, we get:

Notice
that g is identically 0 along the x and y axes.
Taking
the derivative (and setting it equal to zero) of the second of these
compositions, we get
,
which has a solution
for every integer
value of n. The only odd multiple
of
that lies within the
interval 0 < t < 3 is
. Thus
could be a maximum
point for g (i.e., the input that yields g’s maximum over the
given square in the xy-plane).
Taking the derivative (and setting it equal to zero) of the third of these compositions, we get
![]()
which has solution t = 1. Thus
could be a maximum
point for g (i.e., the input that yields g’s maximum over the
given square in the xy-plane).
Thus
we have the four corners and the above two points upon which to evaluate g
to locate the absolute maximum of g over the given square.

The maximum of g over the given square is thus 3, the highest elevation of g over the square.
_____________________________________________________________________
19. Find the absolute minimum of
over the rectangle
defined by
. The lowest
elevation on the graph of z = g(x,y)
above this
closed rectangle in the xy-plane is _____ .
All we need do is to compare the minimum found in problem #17 with the values just tabulated in problem #18:
![]()
Comparing
this with the previous values, we see that the relative minimum of g is
also the absolute minimum over the given square.
_____________________________________________________________________
20. How many local extrema and saddle points has
?
Such
points occur when
, i.e. when
.
This yields the following nonlinear system:
,
which simplifies to
.
The first equation has solutions x = 0 with y=anything, or x
= –2 with y=anything. The
second equation has solutions
y = 0 with x=anything, or y=2
with x=anything. The
conjunction of the first set of solutions with the second yields the following
possible local extrema or saddle points:
![]()
To see whether these points are maxima, minima, or saddle points, we invoke the multivariable second derivative test. The second derivative matrix, the Hessian, is
.
The determinant of this matrix is
.
Evaluating this Hessian determinant function at each of our candidate points, we get:
![]()
Thus (0, 0) and (–2, 2) are both saddle points (since the determinant is negative for these points). To see whether the remaining two points are max or min, we evaluate hxx at these points:
![]()
and
so (0, 2) yields a relative minimum and (–2, 0) yields a relative maximum of h.
So h
has two saddle points, one local minimum and one local maximum point; in total h has 4 local extrema and
saddle points.